3 min read
The Brussels Civic Data Hack: Episode 1
Like nearly everywhere in Europe, Belgium is undergoing a crisis of trust between citizens and their legitimate institutions. Brussels and Wallonia, in particular, are having a bad year.
Scandals, corruption, lack of ability for the political parties to clean up their rank is pushing toward a narrative where the whole PS is corrupt for example, when in fact depending on the scandal, take #publifin for instance, CDH and MR are part of this system, even though PS is taking most of the heat thanks to the fact that it was in power in the last 25 years or so.
What if we could precisely visualise the data and spot possible conflict interests between institutions, public services, private business and political parties ?
What if we could explain the problem of the accumulation of mandates and their possible conflict of interest through some state of the art visualisation that can help anyone, without any related skill to form his own opinion on these issues ?
We believe we, ordinary citizens, can help. We wish to help by using data, open data in particular, to investigate problems for ourselves, and share our results with our fellow citizens so that they can used to draw factual stories about these scandals allowing citizens to have a better perception of the issues at stake hence able to make better choice in the next electoral round (2018-2019).
We wish to organise a small event called a civic hackathon. Everybody interested in a civic use of data and data science is welcome, without exception and with no skill requirements. It’s about gathering under one roof to work with data with a civic purpose in mind. It could be anything: applications tracking parliament activities; crunching and visualisation of societally relevant datasets; dreaming up infographics that would make a complex issue more accessible, and so on.
There is already a open-data movement in Belgium and civil society initiatives like Cumuleo to track mandates and maintain these information in the public sphere. We do not want to reinvent the wheel, so we want to invite you all and see what we can do together.
We envision two steps. In step 1, we gather together for a few hours to hash out some possible projects to develop in the hackathon proper: we make sure each project has the data it needs and a skeletal crew with all the skills to pull it off.
In step 2, two weeks or so later, we take one or two full days to actually develop projects.
The results of the different projects are presented to the whole group at the end of step 2. All code is released as open source. Processed data are published as open data wherever the license of the primary data allows it.
Absolutely everyone is welcome. All you need to take part in a civic hackathon is a passion for all things civic. Every skill is needed. Among them (but there are others) are: software development, statistics, math, journalism, law, design, communication, storytelling. Female and minority participants (however you want to define “minority”) are particularly welcome.
Conclusion : Même pour l’Eglise, refuser de reconnaître responsabilité ou culpabilité ne fait que renforcer ses détracteurs tout en isolant ses soutiens
Key problem of the new @reply redesign on @twitter is: you can't avoid replying to the original twitter user.
it seems #twitter implies that a contextual reply is always done towards the the original source of the tweet.
in mobile and desktop you can untick the users you don't want to include in your reply but you can't untick the source of the tweet from the conversation.
Why would anyone do that ?
There is plenty of very valid reasons to do so :
use case :
Imagine you find a tweet you want to relay to a bunch of people, but you don't want to necessarily reply to the source of the tweet itself, before the change you would simply remove all the users from the reply and add new mentions to the users you want to include or start a new conversation with. now you can remove all the users from the context less the source of the tweet.
Imagine you are being harassed by some trolls and you want to reply but without including the person being harassed (she's already on too much) or you want to help her or him and divert some of the trolls back to you, how do manage that with the new reply system ? you can't. in this case #twitter removed options for victims of harassement on twitter.
I'm still analysing what the new reply system will change, mainly regarding context analysis for #dataviz and other advanced use of Twitter.
some related links :
regarding bots :
Online Human-Bot Interactions: Detection, Estimation, and Characterization