Just a few months ago, AI coding was described as an overblown “auto-complete”, auto-complete has been around for functions and classes and what not since…I don’t know, years ? imagine if PR were rejected because the developer had used auto-complete to help him/her write a piece of code, or worst, a bug fix?

I fully understand that no humans should be tasked to review spam PR & spam automated “contributions” but if a contribution is “generated” by Claude and/with a Human, in my view, it is as much valid as a purely human contribution. Code is Code, Improvement is Improvement.

I bet this will be seen as completely outdated in just a few months, some will resist, will even fight against human+ai contributions, but they are only going against the tide.